sibmas.gif (4337 byte)

International Association of Libraries and Museums of the Performing Arts

Société Internationale des Bibliothèques et des Musées des Arts du Spectacle

HOME

Executive Committee

Institutional Members

International Directory

Congresses

National Collections

Research Sites

Partner Organisations

WHAT'S NEW

FORUM


The Art of the Acting Singer illustrated by Rajisic's TV Opera Diary of a Madman

Nadezda Mosusova (Belgrade)


Documentation et Art de l'Acteur
Records and Images of the Art of the Performer

18ème Congrès International, Stockholm 3-7 septembre 1990 / 18th International Congress, Stockholm 3-7 September 1990
Editor: Barbro Stribolt (Drottningholms Teatermuseum). Stockholm : 1992, p. 89-91


The beginning of requests to the singer to be stage artist as well is bound to creation of the music drama by Richard Wagner and mostly to development of music drama in Russia. It was rare in that time for singers to possess some scenic talent. Anyway, testimony about their achievements came to us through historic documents only. With appearance of the phonograph this state was radically changed, and after application of film, especially with sound, a new era in opera performance was beginning, which was later enhanced by television.

Regarding the art of singer's acting quite seriously started at the beginning of our century with appearance of exceptional scenic personality as it was the figure of Fyador Chaliapin. He was born to embody all components of musical, more precisely operatic realism, which was strengthened on scene by Modest Mussorgsky through his stage works. By bringing fame to Boris Godunov, equally by his singing and scenic presentation, Chaliapin became a symbol of the complete operatic artist. It is a pity, not by his fault, that the opportunities were missed to preserve on film tape for ever the magnificent oeuvre of Mussorgsky, and in it his own art as well, which would be one of the most precious documents of this kind in the history of the theatre.
1 There remained a considerable number of his gramophone records of arias from Russian and other operas, and solo songs, that also testify to his scenic talent, since it is essential to apprehend that art of singer's acting starts from the voice.

With appearance of the music film of the thirties, filmed operettas or films where well-known singers perform as actors, as in films with Martha Eggerth with Jan Kiepura, Nelson Eddy with Jeannette MacDonald or Lawrence Tibbett, norms posed to singers were equal to those that film actors had to conform to. It was not only the voice that was important, but also the appearance, the glamour. That good appearance, dictated by Hollywood and by Metropolitan Opera as well, that glamour already existed both on European opera stages, and especially on Russian opera and ballets scenes at the beginning of this century. The leading figures were Fyodor Chaliapin, Ljubov Andreyeva-Delmass. Marh Kuznetsova- Benois and Alla Nazimova, to mention some of them. A good appearance includes acting too, with interpretation which is close to film, anyway without bad operatic manners.

Much later the similar interpretative approach was also important for television, television film, opera filmed for television and - of course, for TV opera, though visual presentation of characters in grand scenes on small screens
is not as discernable as on large screens. Composers who decided to create TV opera, a genre scarcely spread till now, but, nevertheless, present in music-scenic art, had to conform to aesthetics of small and large screens
both in regard to operatic direction (the composer is the first director of his opera) and operatic-filmic acting based on music ('action does not mean acting'). It we follow some simplified logic we may ascertain that 'grand
opera' is suitable for large screens, while small screens are for small or chamber opera, which represents a phase or genre in development of the old and the new music theatre. Of chamber operas, monodrama or duodrama are the most suitable forms for a (musical) teleplay.

One such chamber television opera, which I mentioned in my papers at previous SIBMAS congresses, is Diary of a Madman by the Serbian composer Stanojlo Rajicic. Russian tradition of fantastic realism and specific theatre of the
absurd was expressed in a peculiar way in Gogolj's work and equally in Rajicic's opera. His Diary was telecast on Belgrade TV 1981 (thirty years after the performance of the first TV opera Amahl and the Night Visitors by Gian Carlo Menotti, world premiere NBC-TV Dec. 24, 1951, staged in Bloomington Opera House Feb. 21, 1952).

As a matter of fact, Stanojlo Rajicic (born 1910), an outstanding composer from the leading ones of Serbia and Yugoslavia, turned to opera after the Second World War as a mature and recognized artist. Otherwise, as an author of numerous solo, chamber, symphonic and vocally-symphonic works, incidental and ballet music, Rajicic substantially contributed to small but imposing operatic output of his country by composing four musical dramas, the third of them being Diary of a Madman. Rajicic's opera was not the first to be composed on Gogolj's text Zapyski sumassedsago - the Englishman Humphrey Searle and the Soviet Jurij Bucko had already put their hands upon it, but Rajicic expressed the text musically in a more intensive way.

At the time when Rajicic started his work on Madman (1975) he was the first in Balkan who came to this medium and, of course, with no experience with the screen at all. He was only close to the problems of operas recorded
on film, singer's acting connected with operatic scenes and the new phase of music films which were made in great numbers from the fifties on: the public has the possibility to see both on the scene and on the film screen
Maria Callas, Tito Gobbi, Mario del Monaco, Anna Moffo and many other brilliant acting singers whose appearance on TV screen contributed to their popularity. In that time many music experts were inclined to identify television with film, while for the composer the problem of the musical screen does not consist in comparison or confrontation of film-television, but in relation screen-literature, instead of hitherto opera-literature. How to make a film or a teleplay from a novel? How to use television as a dramatic medium? How to make theatre from a diary literary form?

The composer preserved all of Gogolj's text, as well as the way of first-person narration. The alienated I of the first-person protagonist suits especially the genre of the fictitious,
2 such as it is Gogolj's miniature novel-diary, but Gogolj's work can also be classified into drama works, and into the genre of melodrama, not musical, though
Diary has also a musical-poetical form of its own, but in the genre of literary melodrama in the best sense of the word. Gogolj's Diary is a story of strong feelings, extreme situations, on the theme of the "little man", well known from Russian literature.

According to some opinions, melodrama as a literary form is a basis to the special form of melodrama in television, a new kind developed on small screen in last decades,
3 since television "can help to ratify extravagant or intense emotions that would seem far less credible in the theatre",4 or in the movies, but therefore very credible in the opera and also in the opera adapted for TV medium.

Nevertheless in such a form as TV opera, or precisely TV music monodrama, the composer depends a lot on the art of the acting singer, who must be really able literally to carry out the burden of all moods expressed in a limited
space, in this case of Gogolj/Rajicic's tragedy of the absurd. The authors, the composer together with the writer, describe systematically the spiritual chaos of the poor and lone clerk, which in the end, becoming king for himself,
gets into mental hospital. Television acting is not a common operatic acting, not even acting in a music drama put on the stage or filmed, because it requires much more intensified feelings with a pronounced economy of artistic means.

If hitherto it was spoken about beauty and glamour in opera, we may ask how to make a nondescript Gogolj's scribe from an artist of marked appearance? If we compare Gogolj's character with the type of the voice, l'emploi,
which was given by the composer to the writer's character, then we arrive to contradiction: - how a performer of the character singer's role is to be found, a dramatic baritone in fact, small and stunted? As we accept
reluctantly a stocky bass as interpreter of Boris, similarly an imposing clerk Popriscin may be disturbing. Therefore Nikola Mitic would not be suitable for the character conceived by Gogolj, but it is important that in his brilliant
creation of that role Mitic is convincing in such measure that we believe him without reservation.


References

1 After nonrealized filmic Boris, Chaliapin made the film Don Quixote after Massenet's opera with the same name in Paris 1932. (back)
2 See Bruce Morrissette, Novel and Film, Essays in Two Genres, Chicago, 1985, pp. 95, 101. (back)
3 See David Thornburn, Television Melodrama, Television, The Critical View, Fourth ed., OUP, 1987, pp. 629-644. (back)
4Ibid., p. 639. (back)


18th Congress

SIBMAS Home Page


URL: http://www.theatrelibrary.org/sibmas/congresses/sibmas90/sto_19.html
Information about this site: Claire Hudson, Secretary General
Last modified: November 21, 2000